Article #1
These talkshows are driving me crazy.
They prey on people's misery, exploiting both the guests and studio
audience. The hosts patronize and psychologize, as they suggest that complex
problems have simple solutions. The genre propagates conservative norms
about sex, and obsolete stereotypes about intimacy and gender. Everyone
involved pretends that this is a wholesome enterprise, entertaining as
well as educational.
Article #2
As the mass media hurtles toward a new century it seems to have one
thing in mind--your opinion. It's just about impossible to turn on the
radio or TV, open a newspaper or magazine, or log onto the Internet without
being implored: "Please, we're dying to know--what do you think?"
Article #3
Sex has no intrinsic Meaning. Almost everyone wishes it did.
The desire to give sex meaning is an understandable, important enterprise.
Honestly approached, it can be a valuable exercise; disguised as the righteous
desire to simply appreciate the meaning sex has, or as the pursuit of
restoring sex's "true" meaning, it is a common source of conflict for
both individuals and society.
Article #4
Harassment or Bullying? Apparently,It
Depends on the Target's Gender
I'm very much against people being mean or violent to each other.
But although I've spent my entire career promoting gender equality, current
efforts designed to protect people from others' sexual energy feels misplaced,
even dangerous to me.
These days it seems that people are looking at gender relationships,
being reminded of sex, and reacting as if all unwanted attention men give
women is best understood as sexual--and therefore damaging.
Article #5
I'm a sex therapist. I spend most of my time in the private worlds
of 25 patients a week. I treat undependable penises and vaginas, desires
that trouble partners, orgasms that don't please, and fantasies that frighten.
Hour after hour in a comfortable chair listening to uncomfortable people,
I sit in a sunlit room bearing witness to the darkest parts of people's
lives.
Article #6
Women's Internalized Oppression:
Undermining Your Own Sexuality
"Slut!"
Like children telling stories about a scary
old man, women criticize each other's sexuality--from a safe distance.
"Slut!" is what women call a woman who is "too"
sexual. It's someone who can enjoy sex without being in love. Someone
who admits she enjoys sex more than a woman "should." In other words,
it's a woman who can enjoy sex the way only men are supposed to be able
to.
Article #7
No one knows how many people are doing it. Maybe you're one of them.
Sex on the 'Net: late at night in a dark, quiet house. Or in the bright
light of morning, just a room away from the kids playing Nintendo. Computer
screens across America are glowing with lusty self-portraits and requests,
aimed at strangers whose "handles" read like vanity license plates: Cumgood.
69ForU. Babyface.
Article #8
Why There's No Such Thing
as Sexual Addiction -- And Why It Really Matters
If convicted mass murderer Ted Bundy had said that watching Bill Cosby
reruns motivated his awful crimes, he would have been dismissed as a deranged
sociopath. Instead, Bundy has said his pornography addiction made him
do it--which many people treated as the conclusion of a thoughtful social
scientist. Why?
Article #9
Take all the predictions of Jules Verne, Nostradamus, and Ray Bradbury.
Throw in the scary prophecies of TV evangelists, the best scammers of
the Psychic Friends Network, and just for fun, Nancy Reagan's astrologer.
None of these visionaries or soothsayers predicted one of the oddest
medical breakthroughs of our age. No, it isn't a cure for cancer or AIDS.
It's a pill that creates erections: a half-hour after taking it, if a
man gets any mental or physical stimulation at all, he gets hard.
Article #10
Most Americans do not want to discuss sexual issues rationally. Their
sexuality poisoned by the culture, they just want their emotional pain
taken away. To people afraid of sexuality, censorship looks attractive.
It appears to be a solution to the pain. This pain, this fear of sexuality,
leads people to support censorship.
Article #11
The Phoenix, AZ City Council recently decided to eliminate sex clubs
for adults. Do you feel safer now?
The Council says that government has a right to protect public morals,
and that having sex in front of (consenting) others is by definition immoral.
They don't need proof that nude dancing leads to harm, they said; it's
enough that the majority of its citizens allegedly "knows" it's wrong.
They also claim that sex clubs spread "disease," although no legislator,
public safety officer, or public health professional could produce any
evidence to support this.
Article #12
In my 20 years as a sex therapist, people continue to ask me one question
more than any other. The most common sexual question is "Am I normal?"
Americans are concerned -- virtually obsessed -- with the normality
of their sexual fantasies, preferences, responses, frequency, secrets,
turn-offs, problems, and bodies. The fear of being sexually abnormal interferes
with and even prevents pleasure and intimacy.
Article #13
Here are a handful of sexuality-related issues bouncing around the
news--with what I modestly believe are sensible responses:
* Banned in Arkansas * Reinstated in Michigan * Computer earmuffs
* Science = child molestation? * Federal entrapment on the Internet *
Yes, Fremont has no bananas * Gay marriage & the Knight Initiative
*
Article #14
Most people have sexual fantasies. Role-playing involves a certain
kind of fantasy, and a certain relationship to that fantasy. It requires
a conscious acknowledgment of the fantasy; furthermore, it involves sharing
that fantasy with a partner, who, presumably, consents to participate
in it.
Article #15
In his classic 1978 book "Male Sexuality" (now available as "The New
Male Sexuality"), Dr. Bernie Zilbergeld discussed the concept of conditions
for good sex. He said that everyone has conditions, or requirements, for
enjoying sex. I believe conditions can be divided into three categories:
those about ourselves, about the environment, and about our partner.
Article #16
WHAT COULD UNITE the PTA, Christian Coalition and American Library
Association? The goal of protecting kids--from a law that supposedly protects
them.
Just weeks ago, former President Bill Clinton signed the Child Internet
Protection Act into law, requiring any library receiving federal funds
to install filtering software on its Internet-access computers. Ostensibly
to make computers "safe" for young children, the federal government has
just fired the latest shot in the nation's culture wars.
|
Article #17 |
|||
|
|
Gay rights are not just for gays. They are essential for every sexual person in America, regardless of orientation. As far as the anti-sex Right is concerned, sexual orientation isn't about straight vs. gay--it's about clean sex vs. unclean sex--and your orientation may very well be "unclean." |
|
|